Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 N.C. App. 169 - State v. Dickerson

20 N.C. App. 169 - State v. Dickerson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2019

6 state decisions

2019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here was evidence that only a few months previously the owner had purchased it for $ 1,800.00, and nothing in the evidence even suggest[ed] any reason to suppose that such extraordinary and rapid depreciation could have occurred as to reduce its fair market value to $ 200.00 or less during the relatively short time intervening between its purchase and the date it was stolen”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.