20 N.C. App. 35 - State v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1982
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Kirby v. Illinois · State v. Accor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It also appears that where photographs' are used by police as an aid in identification, and there is an objection to an in-court identification and requests for a voir dire hearing, the court must make a factual determination as to whether the State has established by clear and convincing proof that the in-court identification is of independent origin, untainted by the illegality, if any, underlying the photographic identification. State v. Accor and State v. Moore, 277 N.C. 65 , 175 S.E. 2d 583 (1970) ; State v. McDonald, 11 N.C. App. 497 , 181 S.E. 2d 744 (1971), cert. den. 279 N.C. 396 ; Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 1247 (1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moses
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.