Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Nev. 88

16 P 434

Mathewson v. Boyle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1887

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 1887-10-05

<p>■Appeal — Failure to File Briefs — Judgment Affirmed.- — When time has been allowed in which to tile briefs and the appellant fails to file his brief, within the time allotted, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.</p>

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1917

4 state decisions

Relies on Goodhue v. Shedd · Finlayson v. Montgomery

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1887-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 By the Court,

Belknap, J.:

¶2 This cause was ordered to be submitted upon briefs. The time within which appellant was allowed to submit his brief expired fifty days since. No brief has been filed in his behalf, nor request made for further time. Under these circumstances, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, by reason of the failure of appellant to prosecute his appeal. (Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397; Goodhue v. Shedd, 17 Nev. 140.)

/20/nev/88 · .json · Public domain