Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 N.J. Super. 93 - State v. Johnson

20 N.J. Super. 93 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1976

7 state decisions

30195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shapiro · State v. Calabrese · State v. Calabrese · State v. Yanetti · Ketline v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine that averment of the time of the commission of the crime is altogether formal, unless the time itself be a legal constituent of the offense, dates back to Ketline v. State, 59 N.J.L. 468, 470 ( E. & A. 1896). Time is not of the essence of the offense `except in cases where an act may be innocent, if done at one time, but criminal if done at another.' State v. Calabrese, 99 N.J.L. 312, 315 ( Sup. Ct. 1924), affirmed per curiam 100 N.J.L. 412 ( E. & A. 1924).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.