Warren v. Kornegay

Decided March 31, 1915

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1915-03-31

<p>Appeal' from District Court, Roosevelt County; McClure, Judge.</p> <p>Action by R. II. Warren against R. Kornegay and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.</p>

Relies on Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1915-03-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1945

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION OP THE COURT.

MECIiEM, District Judge.

¶2— Counsel for appellant raises but one point, namely, that the judgment of the lower court is not sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial judge heard the cause upon depositions and testimony-taken 'by an examiner. Following the practice as announced in Gallup Electric Light Co. v. Pacific Improvement Co., 16 N. M. 86, 113 Pac. 848, we have reviewed the entire record as if trying the case in the first instance, and upon such review our conclusions differ in no wise from those of the trial court. - -

¶3Judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Roberts, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.