¶1 I respectfully dissent. I do not believe that summary judgment would have been appropriate for either party under these facts, and consequently the trial court was in error in granting Clevepak’s motion for summary judgment. However, this case should be remanded for further proceedings on the merits, and thus I must dissent from the majority’s entry of judgment under App. R. 12(B).
20 Ohio App. 3d 113
484 N.E.2d 1367
Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.
Decided December 28, 1984
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1984-12-28
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-12-28
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 115 Ill. 2d 482 - Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center (1987), 33 Ohio App. 3d 220 - Biskupich v. Westbay Manor Nursing Home (1986)
12 federal appellate · 4 district · 47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →