20 Ohio App. 3d 170 - Pryer v. Pryer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “" * * * consideration of the broad issue of the best interests of the child, or children, does not arise before the trial court until the existence of item (a), item (b), or item (c) is established, although, in a narrow sense, best interests may be considered in determining the existence of item (c)."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schnipke v. Schnipke

2. “(c) The child's present environment endangers significantly his physical health or his mental, moral, or emotional development and the harm likely to be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by the advantage of the change of environment to the child.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schnipke v. Schnipke

3. “(a) The custodian or both joint custodians agree to a change in custody.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schnipke v. Schnipke