20 Ohio App. 3d 310 - State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
96 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 158 Ohio App. 3d 31 - State v. Woullard (2004), 74 Ohio App. 3d 686 - State v. Williams (1991)
96 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lytle · State v. Jackson · Vaughn v. Maxwell · State v. Hester · O'Malley v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“petitioner bears the initial burden to submit evidentiary documents containing sufficient operative facts to demonstrate the lack of competent counsel and that the defense was prejudiced by counsel's ineffectiveness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An attorney's failures to object and to subpoena witnesses are within the realm of trial tactics and do not, absent a showing of prejudice, deny a defendant effective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mere failure to make objections which seem appropriate after the fact does not establish prejudicial error as a deprivation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.