20 Ohio App. 3d 333 - Ameritrust Co. v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably 83 Ohio App. 3d 103 - Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A. (1992), 37 Ohio App. 3d 78 - Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc. (1987)
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Adomeit v. Baltimore · Walters v. First National Bank · 60 Ohio App. 2d 100 - Peoples Acceptance Corp. v. Van Epps · 50 Ohio App. 2d 331 - Gerwin v. Clark · Miller Brewing Co. v. Gregg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the parol evidence rule precludes the introduction of evidence of conversations or declarations which occur prior to or contemporaneous with a written contract and which attempt to vary or contradict terms contained in the writing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'proffer evidence of a contemporaneous oral agreement when the agreement was made in order to induce a party to enter into a written contract.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.