20 Ohio App. 3d 41 - McQueen v. Goldey’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably 75 Ohio App. 3d 219 - State v. Coulter (1992), 77 Ohio App. 3d 133 - Howard v. Wills (1991)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Brien v. Angley · Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co. · 6 Ohio St. 2d 14 - State v. Woodards · Kerestes v. United States · Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The accident reconstruction expert witness testified as to the speed of appellee's car upon the point of impact with McQueen (forty m.p.h.), the distance that would be illuminated by the car's headlights, the distance within which a car should be able to stop, whether appellee had applied the brakes, how the accident happened, and other similar issues. Other witnesses, including an eyewitness, also testified as to the speed of appellee's car and the actions of McQueen. {¶ 43}”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Without addressing the relative merits of the cumulative error concept, we conclude that even if we were to accept and apply the concept to a civil case, the accumulation of harmless errors in the case at bar did not constitute prejudicial error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable solely because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.