Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 OHIOST2D 82 - Silveous v. Rensch

Silveous v. Rensch’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2025

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

401969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co. · 81 Ohio App. 445 - Hubbard v. Cleveland Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. · 66 Ohio App. 107 - Llewellyn v. Cincinnati Street Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A special instruction prior to argument, stating that when it appears a litigant knows of the existence of a material witness, and such witness is within the control of the litigant whose interest would naturally be to produce him, and without satisfactory explanation he fails to do so, the jury may draw an inference that the testimony would not be favorable to him, is error where the jury is not also instructed regarding the facts to be considered in determining what evidence a litigant would naturally produce at trial."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.