Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Okla. 236 - Brooks v. Garner

Brooks v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
October 1966
most recently cited

1 district · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently October 1966 · most notably Wimberly v. Winstock (1915), Tucker v. Leonard (1919)

1 district · 57 state decisions

2601908191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Neal · Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. Tweedy · Town of Albion v. Hetrick · Dixon v. Duke · Vinton v. Baldwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order for the plaintiff in error to have prevailed in this cause it was necessary that Mrs. Scarborough’s title be shown to have been clear and free from fraud, purchased by her, in good faith, without notice, and for a valuable consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Purchasers of land which has been fraudulently transferred to their grantor must establish the good faith of their purchase, and it cannot be presumed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.