Alberti v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably United States v. Chapman (1960), Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc. (2001)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Redington v. Cornwell · Cole v. . Malcolm · Smith v. Foran · Sidener v. Pavey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By authority of the statute, and this only, he is permitted to subject the property improved to the payment of his claim; but he can do this only in a suit, as provided in section 653, c. 66, St. Oklahoma 1893, et seq., in which such original contractor is a party defendant, and it is essential before he can enforce his lien against the property that he first secure against the original contractor a judgment for the amount which he seeks to have levied on the property””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Where, in an action foreclosing a subcontractor’s or materialman’s lien, in which the original statement filed inaccurately states the name of the party sought to be charged, and erroneously describes the property intended to be subjected to the lien, the court in the exfercise of its discretion, and in the furtherance of justice, may allow such lien claimant to file an amended statement, and foreclose the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Any lien statement may be amended by leave of court in furtherance of justice as pleadings may be, in any manner, except as to the amount claimed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.