Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 OR 265 - Frink v. Thomas

Frink v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
5
states following
November 1971
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 1971 · most notably Graham v. Merchant (1903), Garvey v. Lashells (1907)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 41 state decisions

110189119001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Ruckman · Murphy v. Lockwood · Brock v. Hidy · Knott v. James B. · Johnson v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule, a party who asks for the rescission of a contract for the sale of real estate must be himself without fault, and when, as in this case, the payment of the purchase money and the making or tender of the deed are to occur simultaneously, they are regarded as mutual and concurrent acts, which disable either party from putting an end to the contract, without performance or a valid offer to perform on his part, and so far as the question of time is concerned, both parties, after the day provided for the consummation may be considered equally in default, and neither can hold himself discharged from the obligation of complete performance, until he has tendered performance on his own side and demanded it on the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.