20 Or. App. 249 - State v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1980
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(7) A statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the fact thereof:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(6) That the accusatory instrument is not definite and certain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.