Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Or. App. 249 - State v. Johns

20 Or. App. 249 - State v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1980
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(7) A statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the fact thereof:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(6) That the accusatory instrument is not definite and certain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.