Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 P.3d 1010 - State v. Jamison

State v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2021

18 state decisions

170200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1228 (§ 238 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Breard v. Greene · Yates v. Gober · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. With a view to facilitating the exercise of consular functions relating to nationals of the sending State: [[Image here]] (b) if he so requests, the competent authorities of the receiving State shall, without delay, inform the consular post of the sending State if, within its consular district, a national of that State is arrested or committed to prison or custody pending trial or is detained in any other manner. Any communication addressed to the consular post by the person arrested, in prison, custody or detention shall also be forwarded by said authorities without delay. The said authorities shall inform the person concerned without delay of his rights under this sub-paragraph....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Deportation with no possibility of reentry into the United States, even if an absolute certainty following conviction of an aggravated felony as defined by federal law, remains collateral to the criminal prosecution because it is `not the sentence of the court which accepted the plea but of another agency over which the trial judge has no control and for which he has no responsibility.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The distinction between direct and collateral consequences of a plea `turns on whether the result represents a definite, immediate, and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendant's punishment'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.