A.P.E. v. People’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 23 Cal. 4th 322 - People v. Rubalcava · Fogg v. MacAluso · People v. Tenorio · Lyman v. Town of Bow Mar · AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As to a vagueness challenge, the basic inquiry is whether the law forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that persons of ordinary intelligence must necessarily guess as to its meaning and differ as to its application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Lovato“capable of inflicting cutting, stabbing, or tearing wounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People Ex Rel. Jwt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.