State v. Gimarelli’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Chicago v. Morales · Porzig v. Nolden · Apodaca v. Oregon · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Roche v. McDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[m]ost states that have ‘two strikes’ laws require sex offenses with some degree of penetration and infliction of serious bodily harm.” In addition, according to the state appellate court, only “[a] small[ ] number of states would impose a sentence of life in prison without parole for a second offense after a similar prior offense. For example, Georgia, Montana, New Mexico, South Carolina, and Wisconsin all have two strikes laws for some types of sexual offenses.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This violent sex offense against a child is quite different from [a] nonviolent property crime.... The Legislature has a right to discourage such behavior and protect the public from such offenders. In this case, Mr. Norris is a repeat child molester. He showed a lack of impulse control in molesting a five-year-old girl under the watchful eye of her father. Molesting a child is considered a violent sexual offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norris v. Morgan“The conviction need not show that a defendant’s rights were not violated; rather, for the conviction to be constitutionally invalid on its face, the conviction must affirmatively show that the defendant’s rights were violated.[ 12 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Booker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.