Davis v. Holy Terror Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
1 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2016
1 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. La Croix · Hedlun v. Holy Terror Min. Co. · Muller v. Flavin · Murray v. Leonard · Mathews v. Silvander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It does not follow that the loss of a limb is not a detriment because the miner who suffers the loss might make more money in some other vocation than he was making before the injury was received.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weidner v. Lineback
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.