Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 SO2D 627 - Little v. Campbell

Little v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2001

6 state decisions

201945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 20 So. 2d 634 - Little v. Dalovisio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the checks were wrongfully obtained. The court refused to dismiss the pleadings, noting that there could hardly be a clearer case of one person assisting and encouraging another in the commission of a wrongful act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “where such person cashes a draft for another person and the person cashing the draft . . . not only knows that these funds are being misappropriated but actually profits from the transaction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the knowledge charged to the defendants is not a conclusion, but is a fact to be proved as any other material fact must be proved in a case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.