Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 So. 3d 46 - Dora v. State

20 So. 3d 46 - Dora v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Puckett v. State · 555 So. 2d 679 - Dennis v. State · 667 So. 2d 590 - Manuel v. State · McGruder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing the grant or denial of jury instructions, this Court considers the jury instructions given as a whole. The trial court may refuse to grant jury instructions that incorrectly state the law, are covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or are without foundation in the evidence. If the jury instructions given fairly announce the law and create no injustice, no reversible error will be found.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.