Moten v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State · 718 So. 2d 1107 - Wall v. State · 688 So. 2d 727 - Medina v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plain[,] concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged and shall fully notify the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f any rational trier of fact, when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, could have found that the essential elements of the crime existed beyond a reasonable doubt, this Court will affirm the denial of a motion for a directed verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable, fair-minded jurors could have concluded that the defendant was guilty of the accused crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.