Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 S.W.3d 603

State v. Nathan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-06-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2013

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Parker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant, Ledale Nathan, appeals judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County rejecting his Batson challenge following a hearing pursuant to an order of this court remanding the cause for a Bat-son hearing in accordance with the procedure in State v. Parker, 836 S.W.2d 930, 939 (Mo.banc 1992). Defendant also renews his appeal as to his first point, which is directed to the alleged plain error of the trial court in sentencing him as a prior and persistent offender.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/20/sw3d/603 · .json · Public domain