Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 SW3D 63 - Latham v. State

Latham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 202nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Solem v. Helm · Lane v. State · McGruder v. Puckett · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We initially make a threshold comparison of the gravity of the offense against the severity of the sentence, and then ask whether the sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense. Only if we find such gross disproportionality do we then compare this sentence to the sentences imposed for similar crimes in this and other jurisdictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.