Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Tenn. 59

Gilman v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1839

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1839-12-15

T. W. Gilman was convicted of common gaming within the corporate limits of the city of Nashville, in the mayor’s court, and sentenced to pay afíne of ten dollars and the costs of prosecution. He moved the court to arrest the judgment. The motion was overruled, judgment rendered, and the defendant appealed in error to this court.

Decided 1839-12-15

Green, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The only question in this case is, whether, if it does not appear of record that a witness on whose evidence an indictment has been found was sworn in open court and sent to the grand jury to give evidence in that case, it will be error. We think itj will not. In practice such an entry is never made on the minutes of the court. The clerk usually endorses on the indictment the names of the witnesses, and that they were sworn. This is done that the grand jury may have evidence that the persons who appear before them to testify have been sworn; and it is highly proper. But if the witnesses have been in fact sworn, their evidence will authorize the finding an indictment whether the fact that they were sworn be endorsed upon thq indictment or not, True, if the witnesses be not sworn in open court, it is error; but the defendant must plead this matter in abatement.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/20/tenn/59 · .json · Public domain