Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 Tex. 803

Davis v. Darling

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1858-07-01

Error from Fayette. Tried below before- the Hon. James H. Bell. Petition for certiorari, filed March 2d, 1855, as follows:— The petition of Socrates Darling, a resident citizen of the county and State aforesaid, respectfully showeth, that heretofore, to wit: on the- day of one John Davis, also a citizen of said county and State, instituted suit against your petitioner before IT. C. Joiner, an acting Justice of the Peace in and for said county, for the sum of $60.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1960

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Roberts, J.

¶1The motion to dismiss the writ of error cannot prevail; for although the first petition and writ are defective, the second fully describes the judgment. The last writ was served in time.

¶2The general exception made by the plaintiff in error, to dismiss the certiorari, should have been sustained. The only diligence, shown by Darling in his petition, in making his defence before the Justice, was in leaving a message for an attorney to attend to his case. He gave it no further attention, and was not present at the trial, and gave no excuse for his absence. The fact that the attorney was previously employed on the other side, and did not take the trouble to hunt him up and inform him of it, even if he received the message, is no excuse whatever.

¶3Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for disposition in accordance with this Opinion.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

/20/tex/803 · .json · Public domain