Cahoon v. West’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1933
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van Steinburg · Baird v. . Daly · Kalk v. Fielding · Jacobson v. Metzger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Mr. Kice, in his work on Evidence (volume 1, p. 585), says: ‘On cross-examination, counsel should be allowed a free range within the subject matter of the direct examination, and wide latitude should be given to a party who has to prove a negative, or to one examining a witness who was a participant in an alleged fraud.’ And again, on page 586, the author says: ‘The cross-examination of a witness cannot be confined strictly to the precise subjects called to his attention upon his direct examination, but should be allowed to extend to any matter, not foreign to the subject-matter of such examination, tending to limit, explain, or modify.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kennedy v. Clinch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.