Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Va. App. 236 - Bailey v. Commonwealth

20 Va. App. 236 - Bailey v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Michigan v. Jackson · Acosta v. United States · Marquez v. Texas · Gray v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) [T]he witness must have had firsthand knowledge of the event, (2) the written statement must be an original memorandum made at or near the time of the event and while the witness had a clear and accurate memory of [the event], (3) the witness must lack a present recollection of the event, and (4) the witness must vouch for the accuracy of the written memorandum.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[T]he general rule [among courts nationwide] is that it is not essential that the record of past recollection shall have been made by the witness, if he knows that it is true as written. It is sufficient if the memorandum was made by someone else but has been examined by the witness and is known by him to be correct.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.