Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Va. App. 510 - Cook v. Commonwealth

20 Va. App. 510 - Cook v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Evans · Duffy v. Hartsock · State v. Fair Lawn Service Center, Inc. · 3 Va. App. 531 - Crews v. Commonwealth · 6 Va. App. 73 - Brushy Ridge Coal Co., Inc. v. Blevins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[A] crime is made up of two parts, forbidden conduct and a prescribed penalty. The former without the latter is no crime." Criminal penalties "should be provided with that degree of clarity that characterizes all criminal law, to the end that its application must not be left to conjecture." If a criminal statute or ordinance does not specify a penalty, it is beyond our province to prescribe one on the assumption that the deficiency was simply an "oversight." "Defining crimes and fixing penalties are legislative, not judicial, functions."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “should be provided with that degree of clarity that characterizes all criminal law, to the end that its application must not be left to conjecture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] crime is made up of two parts, forbidden conduct and a prescribed penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.