Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 Va. App. 713 - Turner v. Commonwealth

20 Va. App. 713 - Turner v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2021

4 state decisions

401995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Va. App. 438 - Martin v. Commonwealth · 18 Va. App. 840 - Woolfolk v. Commonwealth · Stevenson v. City of Falls Church · Shull v. Com. · 16 Va. App. 667 - Shull v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conviction under Code § 18.2-460(C) will be sustained where the Commonwealth proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused (1) intended to intimidate or impede by threats of bodily harm or force a law-enforcement officer in the lawful discharge of his or her duty, and (2) knew or should have known that the law-enforcement officer was engaged in lawful activity `relating to a violation of or conspiracy to violate [Code] § 18.2-248 or § 18.2-248.1(a)(3), (b) or (c).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that Code § 18.2-460(C) requires that any conduct punishable under that subsection of the statute be related to conduct involving `a violation of or conspiracy to violate [Code] § 18.2-248 or § 18.2-248.1(a)(3), (b) or (c).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “evinc[es the] legislative intent to make the punishment for obstructing justice as to certain ... offenses more severe than for obstructing justice generally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.