Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 WASH 184 - Hossack v. Graham

Hossack v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1980

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

501898190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trist v. Child · Christmas v. Russell · Hauselt v. Harrison · Gregory v. Morris · Silent Friend Mining Co. v. Abbot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The order on a future fund which thus operates as an equitable assignment should be carefully distinguished from a mere promise to appropriate an existing or future fund in discharge of an obligation, or a mere promise to give an order on a fund, and the like.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.