20 Wash. App. 175 - State v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 1987
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 70 Cal. 2d 711 - People v. Morse · State v. Ward · 74 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Brown · 10 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Anderson · 3 Wash. App. 128 - State v. East
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have previously recognized this procedure, but found it unnecessary where the news stories contained factually accurate material of a relatively nonsensational nature and, for the most part, told the public (prior to trial) only those basically essential facts of the crimes which would ultimately be presented to the jurors in the controlled atmosphere of the courtroom. State v. Wilson, 16 Wn. App. 348, 354 , 555 P.2d 1375 (1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whenever there is believed to be a significant possibility that individual talesmen will be ineligible to serve because of exposure to potentially prejudicial material, the examination . . . shall take place outside the presence of other chosen and prospective jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is clear that evidence of provocation will justify a second-degree murder instruction because it serves to negate premeditation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Van Zante
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.