Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 WYO 222 - Seng v. State

Seng v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 1934
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1934

13 state decisions

60191319201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Koppala v. State · Freeburgh v. Lamoureux · Bank of Chadron v. Anderson · Fishback v. Bramel · France v. First Nat. Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The bill, as signed by the trial judge, consists of nine' pages, under separate cover bearing the filing mark of the Clerk of the District Court, and. attached to it, but not referred to in the bill or in any way identified or authen ticated by the court or judge, is what purports to be a transcript of the shorthand notes taken by the court reporter; but such transcript, even if it had been incorporated in the bill, does not purport to contain all the evidence. The only way this court can know what the evidence in any case was, is by having it incorporated in the bill of exceptions and properly authenticated by the court or judge as the evidence in the case. The certificate of the court reporter is insufficient for that purpose. (Fishback v. Bramel, 6 Wyo. 293 , 44 Pac. 840 ; France v. First Nat’l Bank of Omaha, 3 Wyo. 187 , 18 Pac. 748 ; Koppala and Lampe v. State, 15 Wyo. 398 , 89 Pac. 576 , 93 Pac. 662 .)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.