Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 20 WYO 456 - Pullman Co. v. Finley

Pullman Co. v. Finley’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2010

20 state decisions

4019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixon v. Pluns · Gustavenson v. State · Kalina v. Union Pacific Railroad · Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. Peavey · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Swarts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That being the settled rule in this state, the affidavit of the jurors relied upon by the defendant could not be received and considered by the trial court to impeach their verdict on the ground of their misconduct. They were not competent proof of the facts therein deposed to, and the court properly refused to grant a new trial upon this ground.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.