In Re K.C. D.C.’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matter of ABE · In Re EH · In Re Ko. W. · In re D.B. · In re J.L.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with the parent's ability to care for the child. Id. (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). See also 29 DCMR § 4703.2(c) & (e) (outlining CFSA's case planning requirements); 29 DCMR § 4703.4 (requiring case planning reassessments”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. IN RE: A.I. I.I.“refus[al] to meaningfully engage with [CFSA] staff or service providers with respect to her mental health.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. IN RE: A.I. I.I.“other options for avoiding the termination of parental rights, including kinship placements,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. IN RE: A.I. I.I.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.