¶1Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think that under the circumstances of this case, there being no proof that plaintiff is vexatiously pur*875suing the defendant with unnecessary litigation, the order was not justified. Blaekmar, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.
200 A.D. 874
Baldwin v. Hamilton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1922-01-15
Decided 1922-01-15