¶1Judgment and order reversed and a new trial granted, without costs, on the ground that the apparent finding by the jury that the defendant C. N. & J. Corporation was responsible for the alleged conversion of the plaintiff’s property was against the weight of the evidence, and on the further ground that the apparent finding of the jury that the other defendants were not responsible for the alleged conversion is likewise against the weight of the evidence. Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.
200 A.D. 878
Sochefsky v. Dinowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1922-01-15
Decided 1922-01-15