¶1
¶2 The decree of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
¶3 Reversed and remanded.
200 Ala. 285
76 So 51
Decided May 17, 1917
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1917-05-17
<p>1. Equity &wkey;>418 — Decree Peo Coneesso.</p> <p>A final decree based upon decrees pro eonfesso, taken without notice after defendants had regularly entered an appearance, some by demurrer and all by a plea, will be reversed.</p> <p>@^>For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Equity, Cent. Dig. §§ 952-971.]</p> <p>2. Appeal and Error <&wkey;1173(l) — Review-Moot Case as to Part of Appellants. The fact that a case has become moot as to some of the appellants will not exclude consideration of the appeal as to the others, there being a severance in the assignments of error, and the appellants who are no longer necessary parties can be discharged by the trial court.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 4562-4567, 4569, 4656.]</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1954
3 state decisions
Relies on Vary v. Thompson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed and remanded · Decided 1917-05-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1
¶2 The decree of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
¶3 Reversed and remanded.