Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 CALAPP2D 682 - Chalmers v. Raras

Chalmers v. Raras’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2008

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. White · 88 Cal. App. 2d 171 - Engasser v. Jones · MacCo Construction Co. v. Fickert · 117 Cal. App. 94 - Cushing v. Levi · 161 Cal. App. 2d 71 - Ashburn v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is always peculiarly a question of fact for the trial court to determine, in the light of all the facts and circumstances of each particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.