People v. Bonds’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 3d 182 - Solberg v. Superior Court · 12 Cal. 3d 512 - McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications · 13 Cal. 3d 778 - Spruance v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications · 130 Cal. App. 3d 847 - People v. Abdul Y. · 78 Cal. App. 3d 619 - Forbes v. Jose S.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so that the party or attorney cannot or believes that he or she cannot have a fair and impartial trial or hearing before the judge....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If directed to the trial of a cause where there is a master calendar,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not later than the time the cause is assigned for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.