200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7
Decided March 23, 2016
California Supreme Court · decided 2016-03-23
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co. (2017), Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2016)
7 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial,”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 209 Cal. Rptr. 3d 123 - People v. Johnson
Relies on 229 Cal. App. 4th 1102 - People v. Batchelor
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2016-03-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial. (Compare People v. Batchelor (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1102, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28.) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.516(a)(1).)
¶2KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate.