Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 CONN 440 - State v. Morowitz

State v. Morowitz’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
5
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably State v. Kulmac (1994), State v. Figueroa (1995)

5 federal appellate · 100 state decisions

4901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rivera v. United States · State v. Esposito · State v. Braman · State v. Hauck · State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rules governing the admissibility of evidence of a criminal defendant's prior misconduct are well established. Although evidence of prior unconnected crimes is inadmissible to demonstrate the defendant's bad character or to suggest that the defendant has a propensity for criminal behavior ... such evidence may be admissible for other purposes, such as to prove knowledge, intent, motive, and common scheme or design, if the trial court determines, in the exercise of judicial discretion, that the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial tendency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e have recognized the legitimacy of the distinction between testimony based on independent personal knowledge and testimony based on inadmissible records, permitting the former while barring the latter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “deemed to have never been arrested ... with respect to the proceedings so erased and may so swear under oath.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.