State v. Corchado’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Mitchell (1987), Massameno v. Statewide Grievance Committee (1995)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Williams v. People of State of New York · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc. · State v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is not sufficient evidence or cause to justify the bringing or continuing of such information or the placing of the person accused therein on trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he discretion to be exercised must be informed and guided by considerations of fundamental fairness that are ingrained in the concept of due process of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“which weighs the interests of the state and society in having the defendant again stand trial against the interest of the defendant, who has already served his sentence, in not being subjected to a new trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.