Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 CONN 607 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
4
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Day (1995), 184 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Burton (1998)

3 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

27019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Brewer v. Williams · Weatherford v. Bursey · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Benjamin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he constitutional right of self-representation depends ... upon its invocation by the defendant in a clear and unequivocal manner. ... In the absence of a clear and unequivocal assertion of the right to self-representation, a trial court has no independent obligation to inquire into the defendant's interest in representing himself .... [Instead] recognition of the right becomes a matter entrusted to the exercise of discretion by the trial court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the exercise of that discretion, the trial court must weigh into the balance its obligation to indulge in every reasonable presumption against waiver of the right to counsel.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The constitutional right of self-representation depends . . . upon its invocation by the defendant in a clear and unequivocal manner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.