Collier v. Douglas

Decided December 10, 1912.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1912-12-10

<p>In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. Action at law by Marie Douglas against J. P. Collier. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.</p>

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1928

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1912-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Edward R. Meek, Judge. Action at law by Marie Douglas against J. P. Collier. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3C. B. Reeder and J. B. Dooley, both of Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiff in error. R. R. Hazlewood and J. H. Synnott, both of Amarillo, Tex., for defendant in error.

¶4Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7A majority of the judges are of opinion that this case was necessarily submitted to the jury, and that no reversible error appears in the charge of the court, either as to instructions actually given or instructions refused. Judgment affirmed.