Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 F.1d 143 - Bates County v. Wills

Bates County v. Wills’s Empirical Analysis

200 F. 143 · 1912

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 1936
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1936

2 federal appellate ·

10191219201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cook v. Foley · Guild v. Andrews · Elliott v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. · Bates County v. Wiles · City of Trinidad v. Hokasona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the action of an engineer, architect, or other person invested with the power of decision as to the performance of a contract is conclusive, ‘except in case of fraud or such gross mistake as implies bad faith or a failure to exercise an honest judgment.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.