In re Basha’s Empirical Analysis
200 F. 951 · 1912
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1950
7 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Kessler · In re Roeber · In re Salvator Brewing Co. · In re J. M. Mertens & Co. · In re Basha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Was not tbe bank excusable for not having filed a formal proof? We think it was, and that the court should have permitted it to be filed nunc pro tunc.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Aarons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.