Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 F.2d 490 - Harrell v. Shuttleworth

Harrell v. Shuttleworth’s Empirical Analysis

200 F.2d 490 · 1952

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Earl Earnest Scott v. United States (1970), Causey v. Civiletti (1980)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

200195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Zerbst v. McPike · Vanover v. Cox · Strewl v. McGrath

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The sentence of imprisonment of any person convicted of an offense in a court of the United States shall commence to run from the date on which such person is received at the penitentiary, reformatory, or jail for service of said sentence. “If any such person shall be committed to a jail or other place of detention to wait transportation to the place at which his sentence is to be served, his sentence shall commence to run from the date on which he is received at such jail or other place of detention. “No sentence shall prescribe any other method of computing the term.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to begin at expiration of sentence defendant is now serving in the Florida State prison.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.