Moore v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis
200 F.3d 1170 · 2000
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 154 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Hughes v. Lott (2003), Hughes v. Lott (2003)
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Percy J. Cooper v. Dora B. Schriro · Brooks v. Ferguson-Florissant School District · Moore v. Novak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] suit for damages attributable to an allegedly unreasonable search may lie even if the challenged search produced evidence that was introduced in a state criminal trial resulting in the § 1983 plaintiff's still-outstanding conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if successful, would not necessarily imply that the ... conviction was unlawful,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Eschen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.