Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 F.3d 1237 - Marilyn Price Lohren Price Cheryl Cramer Daniel Mason Nicole Cramer Nicholas Cramer v. Albert Kramer Stephen D'Anjou Joseph Deladurantey City of Torrance

Marilyn Price Lohren Price Cheryl Cramer Daniel Mason Nicole Cramer Nicholas Cramer v. Albert Kramer Stephen D'Anjou Joseph Deladurantey City of Torrance’s Empirical Analysis

200 F.3d 1237 · 2000

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably Padgett v. Wright (2009), Ortiz v. Jordan (2011)

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

490200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not reviewable on appeal from a final judgment entered after a full trial on the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “proving the defendant's conduct was `malicious, wanton or oppressive or in reckless disregard of the plaintiffs' rights' which, according to the jury instructions, was necessary to the receipt of punitive damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “policy of favoring amendments ... with extreme liberality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.